The court found that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the Defendants had notice of the alleged dangerous condition asserted by the Plaintiff.
The court also found that a genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the alleged condition of the floor mat amounted to an unreasonable risk of harm for visitors to the facility.
Based upon these issues of fact, the court denied the Motion for Summary Judgment.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: The Legal Intelligencer Common Pleas Case Alert, www.Law.com (May 8, 2025).
Source of image: Photo by RDNE Project on www.pexels.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.