The court overruled the Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and held that, where a Plaintiff stated a cognizable negligence claim and generally averred that the Defendant acted with the state of mind necessary for an award of punitive damages, the Defendant’s challenge to these types of claims was premature such that the Preliminary Objections would be denied. The Defendant was advised that the issues could be revisited in a Motion for Summary Judgment after the close of discovery.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: The Legal Intelligencer Common Pleas Case Alert, www.Law.com (May 14, 2025).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.