TORT TALK

Friday, May 24, 2013

Third Circuit Addresses Appeal of Former Luzerne County Judge Mark A. Ciavarella, Jr.

According to a May 24, 2013 article entitled "Third Circuit Keeps Ciavarella Behind Bars" in The Legal Intelligencer by Saranac Hale Spencer, former Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas Judge Mark A. Ciavarella Jr.’s appeal of his 28-year sentence for his involvement in the “kids-for-cash” scandal has been almost entirely rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
 
That Court of Appeals found no merit to his challenges other than his argument that one count of honest services mail fraud should have been time-barred. The court vacated that conviction. However, the vacation of that portion of the conviction will have no effect on the amount of time Ciavarella will serve. Rather, it only serves to reduce the amount that he will pay as part of a special assessment.
 
Posted by Daniel E. Cummins at 3:02 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Ciavarella, Luzerne County

REGISTER NOW -- LACKAWANNA PRO BONO'S GOLF TOURNAMENT IN TWO WEEKS


Posted by Daniel E. Cummins at 8:56 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Judge Minora of Lackawanna County Addresses Standard to Join Additional Defendant

In his recent decision in the case of Montana v. Oakford Wood Home Owners Assn., No. 2012-CV-236 (C.P. Lacka. Co. 2013 Minora, J.), Judge Carmen D. Minora of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas granted an original Defendant's Motion for Leave to Join an Additional Defendant.  The court's opinion provides a thorough overview of the current status of the law on this particular issue.

The court granted the Defendant's Motion, in part, because there was no potential risk for delay attributable to newly joined parties.  The court also found that the Additional Defendant failed to provide any grounds for disallowing its late joinder under Rule 2253(b).

The Court employed the current version of Pa. R.C.P. 2253, which has changed the burden applicable to a defendant who seeks to join an additional defendant beyond the sixty day period prescribed.

The current version of Rule 2253, effective January 6, 2005, deletes the “upon cause shown” requirement, and subsection (b) now merely entitles the plaintiff to object to the belated joinder on the basis that the moving party has failed to demonstrate a “reasonable justification for its delay in commencing joinder proceedings.” Any other party, including the party who is to be joined as an additional defendant, may object only on the grounds of prejudice.

Applying these rules to the circumstances before the court in the Montana case led Judge Minora to grant the motion and allow for the joinder of an additional defendant.

Anyone wishing to review this decision of Judge Minora in the Montana case may click this LINK.

For a Tort Talk synopsis of another decision on this same issue handed down by Judge Terrence R. Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas back in 2011 in the case of Chelland v. Siegfried v. Solomon, click HERE.



 
Posted by Daniel E. Cummins at 1:56 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Joinder of Additional Defendant, Judge Minora, Pleadings

Two More Decisions Addressing Whether Medicare Lien Issues Can Hold Up a Settlement

I recently came across additional decisions in which a trial court addressed the issue of Medicare lien payments possibly holding up the resolution of a civil litigation settlement:

In his 2011 decision in the case of Mackrides v. Marshalls, Marmaxx Operating Corp., No. 11-Civil-6540 (E.D. Pa. April 23, 2013, Joyner, J.), Judge J. Curtis Joyner addressed Medicare issues with regards to a settlement of a slip and fall personal injury suit.  

In this decision, the Court addressed a Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce a Settlement.   The Court ruled that the motion would be denied.  

In the Opinion, the Court noted that, although the Defendant’s failure to tender a proposed Release or settlement, was dilatory, unreasonable, and bordering on being deemed worthy of sanctions, the motion to enforce the settlement was denied where questions about the settlement terms remained unresolved, including questions pertaining to whether the settlement figure included funds to reimburse Medicare, whether Medicare made payments subject to reimbursement, and whether Medicare had waived any right to reimbursement.  

Anyone wishing to review this Mackrides Opinion may click this LINK. 


 
The older Northampton County Court of Common Pleas decision from back in 2011 in the case of Furman v. Wildermuth, No. C-0048-CV-2008-3556 (C.P. Northampton Co. July 12, 2011 Dally, J.), is another example of a trial court decision holding that a settlement of a personal injury may not be conditioned upon receipt of a final conditional payment letter from Medicare.   That Court relied upon the Pennsylvania Superior Court decision in Zaleppa v. Siewel, 9 A.3d 632 (Pa. 2010).  
 
The Furman decision can be viewed HERE.
 
Source:   “Court Summaries,” Pennsylvania Bar News (May, 2013) by Timothy L. Clawges.    
 


Click HERE to view other Tort Talk posts on Medicare issues, including with respect to settlements of personal injury matters.

Posted by Daniel E. Cummins at 1:55 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Medicare Set-Asides, Medicare/Medicaid, Settlement Negotiations, Settlements

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

District Magistrate Judge James Gibbons Wins Both Primaries for Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Judge

District Magisterial Judge James Gibbons, 55, prevailed in both the Democratic and Republican primary elections for the open Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Judge position.

The spot on the bench opened up when Judge Chester Harhut took senior status and then moved to part-time status upon reaching the mandatory retirement age.

District Magistrate
James Gibbons
Judge Gibbons is a University of Scranton graduate and a Seton Hall Law School graduate. 

Over the course of his career, he has worked in the U.S. Attorney's Office before going into practice.  More recently, he gained greater prominence as a local district magistrate judge and, in private practice, as a Mediator/Arbitrator for the resolution of a wide variety of civil litigation matters.  He also previously served on a statewide commission to study and offer recommendations on the Luzerne County juvenile justice system issues that existed a few years back.

District Magistrate Gibbons now moves ahead to the general election in November with no opposition for the position.
Posted by Daniel E. Cummins at 8:46 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Judge Gibbons, Lackawanna County

Monday, May 20, 2013

Novel Facebook Discovery Order Out of Lancaster County


In a recent Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas case of Perrone v. Lancaster Regional Medical Center, No. CI-11-14933 (C.P. Lanc. Co. 2013 Cullen, J.), Judge James P. Cullen crafted a novel method of handling a Facebook Discovery dispute in a civil litigation personal injury case.

This case involved an alleged slip and fall in the defendant hospital allegedly resulting in significant injuries to the Plaintiff.  According to a May 20, 2013 Legal Intelligencer article entitled "Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook," by Ben Present, at the center of this discovery dispute was photographs of the Plaintiff playing in the snow along with a video of the Plaintiff sledding down a hill and tumbling off the sled at the bottom of the hill all the while laughing.

While the defense contended that these photos and the video post-dated the subject accident, the Plaintiff asserted that these items pre-dated the accident.

Judge Cullen granted limited discovery.  In his two-page order, Judge Cullen ordered the parties to hire a "neutral forensic computer expert" to analyze the Plaintiff's private Facebook page during the 17-day window in which the Defendants claim the photographs and video arose.

In its Order, the court directed that the neutral expert was to identify all photographs of snow and references to snow on Plaintiff's Facebook page, along with any photos depicting the Plaintiff participating in physical activity during the specified time frame.

The parties were required by the Order to agree upon an expert within seven days of the court's Order.  The court also mandated that the discovery be completed within 60 days.

Under the Order, the court directed that the expert was to retain the Plaintiff's Facebook username and password and then download the contents of the Plaintiff's Facebook to a hard drive on which data for the time period at issue was to be isolated.

The cost of this process, including the expert's fees, was to be covered by the Defendants, Lancaster Regional Medical Center and Hospital Housekeeping Systems, as the proponent of the discovery request.

As noted by Ben Present in his article in The Legal Intelligencer this "case appears to be the first matter in which a Pennsylvania judge has ordered the hiring of such an expert to review a party's Facebook information."

Anyone desiring a copy of this decision may click this LINK.

I send thanks to Ben Present of The Legal Intelligencer/Pennsylvania Law Weekly for providing me with a copy of this decision.


I have updated the Tort Talk Facebook Discovery Scorecard with this decision.  You can always access the Facebook Discovery Scorecard by going to Tort Talk at www.TortTalk.com and scrolling down the right hand column and clicking on the date noted under "Facebook Discovery Scorecard."  Once on that page, you can access the actual Opinions and Orders by clicking on the case names.  Here's a quick LINK to the Tort Talk Facebook Discovery Scorecard.
Posted by Daniel E. Cummins at 4:07 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Discovery Issues, Social Networking Sites

REGISTRATION OPEN FOR LACKAWANNA PRO BONO'S JUNE 3, 2013 GOLF TOURNAMENT


Posted by Daniel E. Cummins at 1:19 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Subscribe to TortTalk via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search This Blog

Loading...

Tort Talk Awards

LexisNexis Litigation Resource Center 2011 Top 50 Tort Blogs LexisNexis Insurance Law Community 2011 Top Blogs of the Year LexisNexis Insurance Law Community 2009 Top Blogs of the Year

Contact Info

dancummins@comcast.net

Daniel E. Cummins, Esquire
FOLEY, COMERFORD & CUMMINS
507 Linden Street
Suite 700
Scranton, PA 18503
570-346-0745

About Me

My Photo
Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States
View my complete profile
Lawyer Daniel Cummins | Top Attorney Insurance
View Daniel E. Cummins's profile on LinkedIn

Pennsylvania Trial Advocacy Handbook (with Annual Supplement Written by Daniel E. Cummins)

Pennsylvania Trial Advocacy Handbook (with Annual Supplement Written by Daniel E. Cummins)
Click on Book to Purchase

POST-KOKEN SCORECARD

  • UPDATED AS OF May 21, 2013

Facebook Discovery Scorecard

  • UPDATED AS OF May 21, 2013

Products Liability Restatement Scorecard

  • Products Liability Restatement Scorecard

My Published Articles

POPULAR POSTS

  • POST-KOKEN SCORECARD
  • New Atlantic Second Cite for Important Post-Koken Delay Damages Case
  • PRODUCTS LIABILITY RESTATEMENT SCORECARD
  • Claims Rep Pet Peeves
  • ARTICLE: Show Me The Money: Medicare Liens and Personal Injury Matters

Presenting at Recent CLE

LINKS

  • Foley, Comerford & Cummins Law Firm
  • My AVVO.com Profile
  • My LinkedIn.com Profile
  • My JD Supra.com Profile/Documents
  • My Justia.com Profile
  • Pennsylvania Law Weekly
  • Pennsylvania Defense Institute
  • Defense Research Institute
  • Pennsylvania Bar Association
  • Lackawanna County Bar Association
  • The Dickinson School of Law
  • Villanova University

OTHER GREAT BLOGS

  • Drug and Device Law (By James Beck, Esq. and others)
  • Lawffice Space - Employment Law Blog (By Phillip K. Miles, Esq.)
  • Litigation & Trial Lawyer Blog (By Max Kennerly, Esq.)
Add to Technorati Favorites
Subscribe with Kindle

 Subscribe in a reader

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (95)
    • ▼  May (21)
      • Third Circuit Addresses Appeal of Former Luzerne C...
      • REGISTER NOW -- LACKAWANNA PRO BONO'S GOLF TOURNAM...
      • Judge Minora of Lackawanna County Addresses Standa...
      • Two More Decisions Addressing Whether Medicare Lie...
      • District Magistrate Judge James Gibbons Wins Both ...
      • Novel Facebook Discovery Order Out of Lancaster Co...
      • REGISTRATION OPEN FOR LACKAWANNA PRO BONO'S JUNE 3...
      • Another Decision out of Eastern District of Pennsy...
      • A Philadelphia County Rule 1925 Opinion Upholding ...
      • Pennsylvania Superior Court Sides With Claimant in...
      • Judge Mazzoni of Lackawanna County Addresses Notic...
      • Judge Nealon of Lackawanna County Addresses Proper...
      • Judge Zulick of Monroe County Denies Punitive Dama...
      • Plaintiff Permitted to Consolidate Two Separate Mo...
      • Research Tools on Tort Talk
      • Registration Open for Lackawanna Pro Bono's June 3...
      • Registration Open for Pennsylvania Defense Institu...
      • Eastern District Federal Court Dismisses UIM Bad F...
      • Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Upholds ...
      • Registration Open for Lackawanna Pro Bono's Golf T...
      • Tort Talk Expo 2013 a Success - THANKS!
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2012 (277)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (27)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (30)
    • ►  April (26)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (24)
  • ►  2011 (296)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (39)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2010 (305)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (25)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (27)
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (26)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2009 (132)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (24)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (19)

Labels

  • ADR (1)
  • Amendment of Pleadings (10)
  • Appeals (3)
  • Arbitration (1)
  • Assumption of Risk (14)
  • Attorney's Fees (1)
  • Attorney-Client Privilege (8)
  • Auto Business Exclusion (3)
  • Automobile Insurance (253)
  • Automobile Law (52)
  • Bad Faith (46)
  • Bailment (1)
  • Bankruptcy (2)
  • Breach of Contract (5)
  • Brief Writing (2)
  • Cell Phone Use (21)
  • Certificate of Merit (2)
  • Choice of Laws (1)
  • Ciavarella (47)
  • Civil Contempt (1)
  • Civil Litigation (30)
  • Civil Rights Litigation (1)
  • Civility (2)
  • CLE Seminars (81)
  • Collateral Estoppel (2)
  • Colonel Henry Thomas (1)
  • Conahan (27)
  • Conflicts of Interest (1)
  • Construction Litigation (1)
  • Corporate Negligence (1)
  • Coverage Questions (45)
  • Cummins (170)
  • Damages (49)
  • Declaratory Judgment Actions (32)
  • Defamation (7)
  • Defense Research Institute (1)
  • Delay Damages (5)
  • Deposition (8)
  • Dickinson School of Law (3)
  • Discovery Issues (85)
  • Diversity Jurisdiction (1)
  • Dog Bite (1)
  • Dram Shop (1)
  • Duty to Defend (7)
  • Duty to Indemnify (8)
  • E-Filing (1)
  • Economic Loss Doctrine (1)
  • Electronic Filing (1)
  • Emotional Distress Claims (9)
  • Employment Law (1)
  • Evidence (19)
  • Experts (51)
  • Fair Share Act (1)
  • FELA (3)
  • Ferris Bueller (1)
  • Fibromyalgia (4)
  • First Party Benefits (12)
  • Forum Non Conveniens (2)
  • Forum Selection Clause (2)
  • Fraud (3)
  • Future Medical Expenses (6)
  • Gist of the Action Doctrine (2)
  • Godfather (3)
  • Hills and Ridges Doctrine (9)
  • HMO's (1)
  • Homeowner's Insurance (2)
  • Household Exclusion (9)
  • Humor (3)
  • IME (5)
  • Immunity (4)
  • Independent Medical Examinations (10)
  • Independent Psychiatric Examinations (7)
  • Insurance Defense (6)
  • Intoxication (2)
  • Invitee (1)
  • Issue Preclusion (1)
  • Joinder of Additional Defendant (1)
  • Judge Amesbury (4)
  • Judge Burke (2)
  • Judge Caputo (6)
  • Judge Chelak (8)
  • Judge Conaboy (2)
  • Judge Cosgrove (4)
  • Judge Gibbons (1)
  • Judge Harold A. Thomson (8)
  • Judge Kameen (1)
  • Judge Kosik (10)
  • Judge Mazzoni (12)
  • Judge Michael Toole (12)
  • Judge Minora (28)
  • Judge Munley (5)
  • Judge Nealon (69)
  • Judge Strassberger (1)
  • Judge Thomson (5)
  • Judge Van Jura (6)
  • Judge Vanaskie (7)
  • Judge Wettick (5)
  • Judge William Nealon (2)
  • Judge Zulick (1)
  • Judgment Non Pros (3)
  • Judicial Candidates (4)
  • Jury Instructions (3)
  • Jury Questions During Deliberations (1)
  • Jury Selection (1)
  • Jury Verdicts (16)
  • Koke (1)
  • Koken (155)
  • Lackawanna Bar Association (3)
  • Lackawanna County (18)
  • Legal History (1)
  • Legal Malpractice Claims (1)
  • Legal Research (2)
  • Liens (3)
  • Limited Tort (7)
  • Litigation Tips (12)
  • Lokuta (2)
  • Luzerne County (78)
  • Magisterial District Courts (2)
  • med (1)
  • Mediation (1)
  • Medical Event Defense (2)
  • Medical Malpractice (34)
  • Medicare Set-Asides (5)
  • Medicare/Medicaid (20)
  • Monroe County (4)
  • Motion for Recusal (1)
  • Municipal Liability (1)
  • Named Driver Exclusion (1)
  • Negligence Per Se (2)
  • Negligent Entrustment (6)
  • Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (14)
  • Networking (2)
  • No Duty Rule (1)
  • Northeastern Pennsylvania (13)
  • Notice Defense (5)
  • Nursing Homes (1)
  • Obama (6)
  • Peer Review (4)
  • PennDOT (4)
  • Pennsylvania Defense Institute (50)
  • Pennsylvania Law Weekly (2)
  • Personal Jurisdiction (2)
  • Pike County (12)
  • Pleadings (22)
  • Policy Exclusions (5)
  • Post (1)
  • Post-Koken (33)
  • Practice of law (10)
  • Practice Tips (41)
  • Pre-Complaint Discovery (1)
  • Premises Liability (53)
  • Products Liability (32)
  • Professional Courtesy (8)
  • Professionalism (12)
  • Property Insurance Coverage (4)
  • Proximate Causation (5)
  • Punitive Damages (29)
  • Recusal (1)
  • Reduce Stress (2)
  • Regularly Used Non-Owned Exclusion (13)
  • Releases (13)
  • Removal to Federal Court (2)
  • Res Judicata (1)
  • Rescue Doctrine (1)
  • Romney (1)
  • Sackett (1)
  • Sanctions (1)
  • Scope of Examination of Witness at Trial (1)
  • Seat Belt Defense (6)
  • Section 1983 (1)
  • Service of Process (2)
  • Settlement Negotiations (11)
  • Settlements (3)
  • Short Story (1)
  • Skiing (3)
  • Slander (1)
  • Slip and Fall (28)
  • Social Host Liability (1)
  • Social Networking Sites (39)
  • Special Needs Trusts (1)
  • Spoliation of Evidence (6)
  • Stacking (1)
  • Statute of Limitations (10)
  • Strict Liability (22)
  • Subrogation (9)
  • Sudden Emergency (1)
  • Sudden Medical Emergency (1)
  • Suicide (1)
  • Supersedeas (1)
  • Supreme Court (2)
  • Surveillance (1)
  • Third Circuit (2)
  • Tort Reform (1)
  • Tort Talk (70)
  • Tortious Interference with Contracts (3)
  • Transfer of Venue (13)
  • Trespass (1)
  • Trip and Fall (24)
  • Trivial Defect Doctrine (8)
  • Twitter (2)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (3)
  • UIM (200)
  • UIM Benefits Set-Off (4)
  • UIM Exhaustion Clauses (3)
  • UM (85)
  • Under (1)
  • Underinsured Motorists Claims (197)
  • Unin (1)
  • Uninsured Motorists Claims (81)
  • Venue (20)
  • Verdicts (5)
  • Vocational Experts (1)
  • Voir Dire (1)
  • Wilkes Law School (2)
  • Workers' Compensation (10)
  • Wyoming County (1)

DISCLAIMER

Daniel E. Cummins, Esquire publishes this site for general informational purposes only. The materials in this website do not constitute legal advice, do necessarily reflect the opinions of the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins or its members, are not an indicator of future results, and are not guaranteed to be current, up-to-date, or applicable to your circumstances. Under no circumstances should you rely upon the information contained in this website without first seeking out and securing your own attorney.


This website and the transmission is not in any way intended, and does not operate, to create an attorney-client relationship with any person or entity. No attorney-client relationship will be created with Daniel E. Cummins, Esquire or the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins unless and until you have purposefully sought to retain us, we have had a chance to clear any conflicts, and you receive a letter from us confirming the creation of an attorney-client relationship and explaining the parameters of the relationship. It is also noted that Attorney Daniel E. Cummins and the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins only practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.


With respect to the links on this website, they are not intended as referrals to, or endorsements of, those linked sites.


Neither Daniel E. Cummins nor the law firm of Foley, Cognetti, Comerford, Cimini & Cummins can guarantee that the material accessible from this website will be virus free.



In creating this website, Daniel E. Cummins and the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins have strived to comply with all legal and ethical requirements. Neither Daniel E. Cummins nor the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins or its members intend to practice law in any jurisidiction where they are not licensed to practice. Daniel E. Cummins and Foley, Comerford, & Cummins DISCLAIM ALL EXPRESS WARRANTIES AND IMPLIED WARRANTIES INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.