The appellate court found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and had properly applied Pa.R.E. 901 which Rule of Evidence governs the authentication of evidence.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Although this is a criminal court case, the rationale of the court regarding the admissibility of text messages and social media would likely equally apply in a civil litigation context.
Source “The Legal Intelligencer State Appellate Case Alert” www.Law.com (Aug. 27, 2024).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.