In a new Federal Eastern District Court decision in Smith v. Nationwide, No. 19-1217 (E.D. Pa. June 24, 2019 Baylson, J.), concerning the application
of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v. GEICO finding
the Household Exclusion in UM/UIM policies to be invalid, the court denied a
12(b)(6) motion and held that that Gallagher is applicable even in
situations where the Host and Household Vehicles are insured by different
companies, where the Household Policy contains a stacking provision.
This represents an extension of the Gallagher v. GEICO
decision as that decision involved policies from the same carrier on all of the
vehicles involved.
Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing
this case to my attention.
Note that you can join Attorney Cooper and myself for
a Webinar on the Gallagher v. GEICO decision on July 8th at
Noon. Here is a LINK to the Tort Talk
post with the Registration information for that CLE Webinar.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.