In the case of Brown v. Teva Pharm., Inc., 19-3700 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 23, 2019 Bartle, J.), the court found that a Plaintiff correctly argued that, where the Defendants filed a Notice of Removal in federal court before being served with the Complaint, but filed a copy of the Notice of Removal in the state court after they were served, removal was not properly completed.
As such, the court granted the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this case may click this LINK. The Court's Order can be viewed HERE
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Nov. 26, 2019).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.