The court found that the Plaintiffs did not show the required direct “physical loss or damage to” their properties.
The court additionally found that the policy’s virus exclusion provisions also applied to prevent coverage.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Nov. 3, 2022).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.