The court ruled that the record before it confirm that the law firm did not sustain any direct physical loss due to the pandemic closures and, as such, the law firm was not entitled to business interruption coverage.
The court also found that various exclusions under the policy applied.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (August 10, 2021).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.