The court additionally sustained Preliminary Objections and struck a claim against another Defendant for negligent entrustment based upon a lack of sufficient factual specificity to support that claim. In this regard, the court noted that the claim of negligent entrustment involves knowledge that is incident-specific, and not only allgations of generalized misgivings in regards to allowing another person to operate a vehicle.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to attorney William C. Robinson, III of the Pittsburgh law firm of Robb Leonard Mulvihill, LLP for bringing this case to my attention.
Source of above image: Photo by D'Vaughn Bell from Pexels.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.