In so ruling, the appellate court rejected the Defendants’ argument that not sealing the settlement agreement would have a chilling effect on future settlements and would go against the parties’ interests in privacy. The appellate court found no abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying the Motion to Seal.
The Superior Court also ruled that the Defendants did not overcome the common law presumption of openness in courts and the Defendant did not meet their burden of showing good cause for sealing the record.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “Luzerne Judge’s Refusal to Seal Settlement Agreement in Med Mal Case Upheld,” by P.J. D’Annunzio of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Aug. 20, 2020).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.