The
court ruled in this fashion after finding that the Plaintiff’s claim sounded in
ordinary negligence and not professional negligence.
In
this matter, the Plaintiff alleged that she was sexually assaulted by an
employee of the hospital while the Plaintiff was a patient at the
hospital. The Complaint asserted a
claim against the hospital for negligent hiring, supervision, and training.
After
the Complaint was filed, the hospital filed a Notice of Intention to Enter a
Judgment of Non Pros on a professional liability claim because Plaintiff did
not file a Certificate of Merit.
The
Plaintiff responded with a Motion to Determine a Necessity of Filing a
Certificate of Merit Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.6. The hospital then filed a Preliminary
Objection as to the sufficiency of the Plaintiff’s claim against it.
As
stated, the court found that the Complaint asserted an ordinary negligence
claim for which a Certificate of Merit was not required. The court more specifically stated that the
Plaintiff’s claim against the hospital did not raise questions of medical
judgment, allege substandard medical treatment, or allege that the
hospital’s actions fell below a professional or medical standard.
The court additionally found that a jury could determine whether the hospital allegedly breached its duty to properly hire, supervise, and train its employee without any need for expert opinion.
The court additionally found that a jury could determine whether the hospital allegedly breached its duty to properly hire, supervise, and train its employee without any need for expert opinion.
Accordingly,
the court found that the Plaintiff could proceed in this claim without the
necessity of filing a Certificate of Merit.
Anyone
wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source:
“Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Feb. 26,
2019).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.