In
the case of Rosenthal v. Am. States Ins.
Co., No. 1:18-cv-01755 2019 (WL 1354141 M.D. Pa. March 26, 2019 Kane, J.),
the court dismissed a bad faith count in a UIM case but allowed the Plaintiff
the right to file an Amended Complaint.
Generally
speaking, after reviewing general bad faith law, the court noted that failing
to plead descriptions of what a carrier actually did, or why
they did it, can be fatal to a bad faith claim under the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
Of
note, the court confirmed that an allegation that the carrier paid first party
medical benefits while not paying UIM claims is not in and of itself bad
faith. The court noted that allegations
of bad faith in this regard must go beyond “a mere inconsistency” in the
handling of these two (2) types of claims under the policy.
Moreover,
the court also noted that an allegation of a bad faith failure to communicate
requires the Plaintiff to plead actual efforts to communicate with the carrier
to which the carrier failed to respond in good faith.
Judge
Kane additionally held that identifying the difference between a demand and an
offer alone cannot serve as the basis for claim for bad faith, absent
allegations that the carrier acted unreasonably and in bad faith by making the
lower offer. In this case, the Plaintiff
was demanding $1 million dollars in settlement, which she alleged was lower
than her actual damages, and asserted that the carrier only offered
$107,012.00. The court found that these
allegations, in and of themselves, were insufficient to support a claim for bad
faith.
The
court noted that a low but reasonable estimate would be not treated as bad
faith. Here, the insured also did not
allege any facts from which a jury could plausibly conclude that the
Defendant’s offer was unreasonable and not made in good faith as opposed to an
offer being made as part of the ordinary course of negotiations between
carriers and Plaintiffs.
Anyone
wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK
I
send thanks to Attorney Lee Applebaum of the Philadelphia law firm of Fineman,
Krekstein & Harris, and the writer of the Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Insurance Bad Faith Case Law blog for bringing this case to my attention.
Monday, April 22, 2019
Low Ball Offer Not Necessarily Bad Faith
Labels:
Bad Faith,
Bad Faith - First Party Claims,
Bad Faith-Claims Handling/Investigation,
Bad Faith-Low Ball Offer
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.