This decision is also notable for its Choice of Law analysis in terms of whether Ohio law or Pennsylvania law should be applied. In the end, the court found that Pennsylvania law should be applied under the analysis.
In its decision, the court ruled that, where a product
manufactured in another state injures a Pennsylvania resident who bought and
used the product in Pennsylvania, the law of Pennsylvania will be applied to
the personal injury case. The court
found that Pennsylvania’s contacts and interests are stronger than those of the
state where the product is merely manufactured.
Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.
Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney James M. Beck of the Philadelphia
law office of Reed Smith for bringing this case to my attention.
Source of image: www.fleximize.com
Source of image: www.fleximize.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.