Following a settlement conference the parties settled an underinsured motorist (UIM) for $100,000. The letter confirming the settlement included an agreement “to satisfy any and all liens being asserted in this matter with these settlement funds.”
The Plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement when the carrier would not settle the case without the letter.
The court granted the Plaintiff's motion to enforce the settlement. Interestingly, at footnote 5 the court noted that if the carrier "seeks certainty that Medicare will never assert a lien, the Court is doubtful that Medicare could or would provide such a guarantee with regard to the unknown, hypothetical costs for future medical care that may or may not occur.”
Anyone desiring a copy of this decision may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net.
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention.
Commentary:
This decision supports an argument that requests for confirmation of possible future Medicare liens will not be upheld. This decision also appears to be another example of a type of case were the court will not allow a payment of a settlement amount to be held up by a demand for the production of a Final Medicare Lien Letter first if that contingency was not a part of the pre-settlement negotiations.
Keep in mind, however, that other court decisions have held that where the carrier makes specific demands, during the course of settlement negotiations, that a Final Medicare Lien Letter will have to be produced prior to the issuance of a settlement draft, such a demand will be upheld as a part of the meeting of the minds in the settlement process.
For other Tort Talk blog posts on this recurring issue, click HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.