There remains a split of authority on the issue of consolidation versus severance of Post-Koken third party claims and UIM claims across the Commonwealth. There also remains a split of authority on this issue within several counties, including Lackawanna, Allegheny, and Philadelphia Counties.
Another decision in favor of consolidation of Post-Koken claims was recently handed down by Judge Nina Wright Padilla in her one line Order denying a Motion for Sever in the case of Schlesinger v. GEICO, June Term 2014, No. 0549, Control No. 14083387 (C.P. Phila. Co. Sept. 26, 2014).
Anyone desiring a copy of this one line Order may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net.
I send thanks to Attorney Steward A. Bernstein of the Philadelphia law firm of Kanter, Bernstein & Kardon for bringing this case to my attention.
For a comprehensive listing of Post-Koken decisions from across the Commonwealth on this issue and other Post-Koken issues, check out the Post-Koken Scorecard that is always freely accessible by clicking the link to the same down on the right hand column on the Tort Talk Blog at www.TortTalk.com. Here is a quick LINK to the Post-Koken Scorecard for your easy reference.
Please do not hesitate to let me know of any Post-Koken decisions you may be aware of from any county in order that the Scorecard may be continually updated for the benefit of all.
Wednesday, October 8, 2014
Another Philadelphia County Decision in Favor of Consolidation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.