Sunday, April 10, 2011

Preliminary Objections Granted in Luzerne County Post-Koken Case

Another post-Koken decision on a pleadings issue has come out of Luzerne County. On February 28, 2011, in the case of Price v. Price, Auto Glass Unlimited, Inc., and State Farm, No. 13625-Civil-2010, Judge Tina Polachek Gartley, issued an Order on various Preliminary Objections filed by both State Farm and the Plaintiff.

In Price, a post-Koken Complaint was filed by the Plaintiff where the Plaintiff joined the tortfeasor and the UIM carrier, State Farm under one caption.

State Farm filed Preliminary Objections solely on the basis that the Plaintiff’s breach of contract cause of action against them was really a claim for bad faith.

In response, Plaintiff filed Preliminary Objections to State Farm’s Preliminary Objections, arguing that State Farm Preliminary Objections were vague in that they failed to state specifically the grounds for the Preliminary Objections in violation of the requirements of Pa. R.C.P. 1028(b).

Judge Gartley sided with the Plaintiff and granted the Plaintiff’s Preliminary Objections to State Farm's Preliminary Objections and also denied State Farm's Preliminary Objections.

I am uncertain as to how State Farm or its defense counsel has followed up since.

I send thanks to Attorney Ann Farias of the O'Donnell Law Offices in Kingston, Pennsylvania for forwarding this decision to my attention.

I note that this decision was by Order only without much any explanatory rationale. However, should you wish to obtain a copy of this Order, please do not hesitate to contact me at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.