In the case of Bryne v. Terex USA, LLC, No. 2:25-CV-00586-GAM (E.D. Pa. McHugh, J. Oct. 28, 2025), the court denied a Motion by a Defendant to Transfer a case from the Eastern District to the Middle District, where the alleged accident occurred.
In so ruling, the court noted that, under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a), District Courts may transfer a case to another district where venue is proper “for the convenience of parties and witnesses or in the interests of justice.”
The court applied the various factors set forth in the case of Jumara v. State Farm Ins. Co., 55 F.3d 873, 879-80 (3d Cir. 1995) to support the denial of the Motion to Transfer.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK. The Court's companion Order can be viewed HERE.
Source: Article – “Fed. Judge Rejects Manufacturer’s Attempt to Move Product Liability Suit to Middle District,” By Riley Brennan of The Legal Intelligencer (Oct. 30, 2025).


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.