Of note, on appeal, the Superior Court held that the trial court did not err in imposing an award of delay damages where the trial court expressly stated that its award in this regard did not include the COVID-19 judicial emergency period in mid-2020.
In addition to affirming the trial court's award of delay damages, the Superior Court went on to note that, regardless, the COVID-10 pandemic and the ensuing judicial emergency did not serve to diminish the rights of Plaintiff to be made whole or create an unjust windfall in favor of Defendant tortfeasors.
The court otherwise held on appeal that the Plaintiff’s evidence at trial amply supported the jury’s award of over $11.4 million dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.
The Superior Court otherwise affirmed the trial court’s decision in concluding that the jury’s verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “The Legal Intelligencer State Appellate Case Alert,” www.Law.com (Aug. 6, 2025).
The court otherwise held on appeal that the Plaintiff’s evidence at trial amply supported the jury’s award of over $11.4 million dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.
The Superior Court otherwise affirmed the trial court’s decision in concluding that the jury’s verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “The Legal Intelligencer State Appellate Case Alert,” www.Law.com (Aug. 6, 2025).
Source of image: Photo by Nick Fewings on www.unsplash.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.