The court found that the carrier failed to show that the loss was excluded under the policy.
The carrier also did not demonstrate that there were undisputed facts that would preclude the Plaintiff from proceeding on the bad faith claim asserted. Rather, the Plaintiff argued that the carrier’s handling of the claim was less than complete and was, to some extent, unreasonably delayed.
The court additionally noted that the Plaintiff faulted the carrier for allegedly failing to advise the Plaintiffs, in writing, of the denial of the claim. It was also noted that the carrier allegedly did not provide the Plaintiff with the reasons for the denial.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Aug. 10, 2023).
The court additionally noted that the Plaintiff faulted the carrier for allegedly failing to advise the Plaintiffs, in writing, of the denial of the claim. It was also noted that the carrier allegedly did not provide the Plaintiff with the reasons for the denial.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Aug. 10, 2023).
Photo by Rob Hayman on www.unsplash.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.