Judge Kearney started off his Opinion by stating, “Truth-seeking in our adversary system of resolving disputes depends on zealous advocacy of grounded legal arguments based on facts. Facts are facts; they are not theories or hopes. Misrepresentation of facts are not permitted in court. Parties and their lawyers who present knowing false facts to the court cannot recover in the public’s courthouse.” See Op. at 1.
As part of the support for the dismissal of the claim, the court noted that the Plaintiff sat by during depositions while his female friend lied under oath that she was the Plaintiff’s wife. That friend then repeatedly invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when she realized that the opposing party had uncovered her lies. Thereafter, the friend, who purported to be the Plaintiff’s wife, quickly dropped her false of loss of consortium claim when the opposing party would not pay her based upon those misrepresentations.
In the end, based upon this evidence, and other evidence, the court dismissed the case after finding that the pro se Plaintiff had committed a fraud upon the court.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK. The Court's Order can be viewed HERE.
I send thanks to Attorney Thomas Butler of the Flourtown, PA office of Butler Law for bringing this case to my attention.
Source of image: Phot by Brett Jordan on www.pexels.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.