According to the Opinion, the court found that the Defendant spoliated surveillance camera tapes. The court found that this allowed for a permissive adverse inference jury instruction.
Based on the possibility of a permissive adverse inference, the court found that summary judgment was precluded with respect to any argument regarding notice of the alleged dangerous condition.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK. The companion Order by Judge Brann can be viewed HERE,
I send thanks to Attorney James M. Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm bringing this case to my attention.
Source of image: Photo by Justin Buisson on Unsplash.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.