Whether building code officials contracted to enforce the
Construction Code Act by a local governmental entity are entitled to immunity
under the Tort Claims Act was addressed in the case of Hartzell v. SM Ross, Inc., et.al., No. GD 17-CV-011430 (C.P. Allegh.
Co. March 25, 2019 Connelly, J.). In this case, the court ruled in favor of the Defendants,
finding that these particular Defendants were indeed afforded immunity in negligence causes of action.
According to the Opinion, this case arose following a
landslide which damaged the Plaintiff’s newly purchased home. The Plaintiffs failed a Complaint against
Building Inspection Underwriters, Inc. and other Defendants, including a local
governmental agency.
The court generally noted that the local governmental agency
was entitled to the immunity provided under 42 Pa. C.S.A. §8541 of the Tort
Claims Act.
The court additionally noted that the Pennsylvania Code
requires that local governmental entities appoint a building code official to
enforce the Construction Code Act.
In part, the Plaintiffs sued the Borough Code Officials for
failing to enforce the code provisions relative to the premises at issue. In response, those particular Defendants
asserted that they were entitled to protections afforded by the Tort Claims
Act. In the end, the court ruled that
the Tort Claims Act does indeed afford immunity to Building Code Officials
contracted to enforce the Construction Code Act by a local governmental agency.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click
this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney William J. Bryers of the
Philadelphia law firm of Pillinger, Miller, Tarallo, for bringing this case to
my attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.