In her recent Order in the case of
Simonetti v. Lalko and Depositors Ins. Co., No. 2018-CV-02421 (C.P.
Luz. Co. Aug. 27, 2018 Gelb, J.), the court denied the carrier’s Motion for a
Protective and to Stay a Deposition of its Adjuster but confirmed that the
Plaintiff may not inquire into areas of the adjuster’s mental impressions or
conclusions or opinions respecting the value or merit of the claim or with
respect to defenses of the claim or strategy or tactics in the defense of the
claim by the carrier.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click
this
LINK.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.