In the case of Allstate
Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. v. Archer, No. 1:17-CV-331 (W.D. Pa. June 4,
2018 Hornak, J.), the Western District Federal Court declined to address a stacking
issue raised in a declaratory judgment action after finding that the issue
would more properly be decided by the state court given the contractual issues
presented.
As such, in this matter, the court remanded the case to the
state court system for a decision.
In so ruling, the court weighed several factors with respect
to the proper exercise of federal jurisdiction primarily as set forth in the
case of State Auto Ins. Co. v. Summy,
234 F.3d 131, 133 (3d. Cir. 2000) [citations omitted] and Reifer v. Westport, 751 F.3d 129, 145-46 (3d. Cir. 2014).
As such, this Western District Federal Court decision raises
the question as to whether the federal district courts of Pennsylvania will
accept stacking declaratory judgment actions for a decision, or will continue
to remand such issues back to the state court for resolution.
Please click this LINK to view this decision online.
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper, Esquire of the
Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bring this case to my attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.