The article outlines the debate on the possible effect of the United States Supreme Court's ruling upholding the validity of Obamacare upon the ability of defense counsel in civil litigation matters to attack claims for recoveries for future medical expenses by asserting that the Plaintiff may have health insurance pursuant to Obamacare.
If you are unable to access the article online, please let me know at dancummins@comcast.net and I will email you a copy.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.