In the recent case of USAA v. Hudson, 101 Del. 154 (C.P. Del. Co. Feb. 21, 2014), the Court ruled that collateral estoppel precludes a re-litigation of an action in which the insured seeks UIM coverage when the same issue was previously litigated, even though the award may have been less than the policy limits.
I do not have a copy of this one but should anyone out there have a copy they can share with me, I will share it with the masses.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.