The defense asserted in this matter that they were entitled to have the Plaintiff's alleged injuries evaluated by separate and distinct medical specialists as the types of injuries alleged were often treated by doctors of different specialties. The defense also argued that the fact that the Plaintiff treated with two separate orthopedic surgeons supported the request for multiple independent medical examinations (IMEs).
The Plaintiff countered with the argument that his injuries were all orthopedic in nature and could all be addressed by a single physician at a single IME.
As noted in the Opinion, Pa.R.C.P. 4010, which governs the parameters of IMEs, is silent on the issue of requests for multiple exams. In his Opinion, Judge Nealon reviewed a number of cases surrounding the issue, including several previously issued by Judge Carmen D. Minora and Judge Robert A. Mazzoni, also of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas.
Judge Terrence R. Nealon Lackawanna County |
As cervical spine disc injuries and carpal tunnel injuries were not within the exclusive domains of separate and distinct medical specialties, the court in DiGiacinto noted that the defense could secure a comprehensive IME through the retention of an orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon.
Anyone wishing to review this decision may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.