In the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in the
workers' compensation case of
Phoenixville
Hospital v. W.C.A.B. (Shoap), ___
A.3d ___, 2013 WL 6132096 (Pa. Nov. 21, 2013), the court addressed the issue of
whether jobs should be considered to be available to an employee for purposes
of granting a modification of the employee’s compensation benefits pursuant to
Section 306(b) when the employee applied to each position listed in a labor
market survey and received no offers of employment.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ultimately ruled that “[a]
more reasonable reading of Section 306(b), however, and one that comports with
a commonsense reading of “substantial gainful employment that exists,” as well
as the Act's humanitarian purposes,
is that the proof required to reduce or suspend a claimant's benefits must rest
upon the existence of meaningful employment opportunities, and not the simple
identification of jobs found in want ads or employment listings.”
|
Michael J. Foley, Esq.
Foley Law Firm |
Notably, in its decision the Supreme Court cited several
times to an article by local Scranton Plaintiff’s Attorney Michael J. Foley of
the Foley Law Firm entitled
Funded Employment and Vocational Rehabilitation
Shams Affecting Injured Workers, 2 Ann.2000 ATLA–CLE 2845 (2000).
Now that's pretty impressive in my book.
Here is a
LINK to the Supreme Court's Opinion in
Phoenixville Hospital.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.