Homeowners Insurance case of note:
Viscounte v. Liberty Mut. Group, 2012 WL 6524980 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2012) (mem.)(In a case involving a homeowner's claim arising out of a flood incident, the court ruled that an insurer is not required to show that the process used in reaching its conclusion was flawless; instead, the insurer is only required to show that it conducted an investigation sufficiently thorough to yield a reasonable foundation for its action; insurer's refusal to pay constitutes nonfeasance (as opposed to malfeasance--the improper performance of a contractual duty) which is not actionable under PA's UTPCPL).
This Viscounte decision can be viewed online HERE.
I sent thanks to Attorney Bill Mabius of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice for bringing this case to my attention.
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Homeowner's Insurance Bad Faith Claim Reviewed
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.