Monday, August 8, 2011

Appellate Ruling That UIM Offset Includes Umbrella Policy Limits Stands

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has denied allocatur in the two companion underinsured motorist cases of D'Adamo v. Erie Ins. Exchange and Holocher v. Erie Ins. Exchange, thereby allowing to stand a Superior Court panel's ruling that benefits collected under a tortfeasor's umbrella insurance policy can serve as an offset against the amount of recoverable underinsured motorist benefits in a given matter.

Source:  Article in August 9, 2011 Pennsylvania Law Weekly entitled "High Court Won't Mull Umbrella Policy Offsets in UIM Cases."

Here is a link to my prior Tort Talk post on an article of mine in which the D'Adamo case is summarized:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.