The rationale behind the decisions, in part, was that the Plaintiffs did not suffer a “physical loss of or damage to” property.
Because the Court made the above initial finding it felt that it did not need to address the arguments raised by the carriers relative to any Virus Exclusions contained in the policies.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Jan. 24, 2023).
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Jan. 24, 2023).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.