According to the Opinion, at the time of the accident, the
Plaintiff’s husband was coming to visit her at the Defendants' premises. When the Plaintiff saw that her husband's vehicle became stuck in the ice and snow on the roadway leading up to the
location, the Plaintiff began to walk towards her husband and, while doing so, slipped and fell.
The Plaintiffs attempted to avoid the summary judgment by
arguing that the hills and ridges doctrine was inapplicable because conditions
were not generally icy in the area at the time of the incident and that the
accumulation on the road was allegedly not natural.
Judge Arthur L. Zulick Monroe County |
The court also noted that the record confirmed that the
Plaintiff knew that the road was hazardous before she stepped on to it because
she had seen her husband’s car slide backwards down the roadway on the
hill.
The court also noted that, although the Plaintiffs argued
that there was insufficient evidence of generally slippery conditions
prevailing in the area that day, both Plaintiffs had testified that there had
indeed been a recent snow fall.
Based upon the record before the court, summary judgment was
granted under the hills and ridges doctrine.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click
this LINK.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (June 5,
2018).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.