After review the record before the court and comparing the same to the current status of Pennsylvania law pertaining to sanctions for alleged spoliation of evidence, the court ruled that the Plaintiffs were entitled to an adverse witness jury instruction that the Plaintiff’s counsel would be permitted to cross-examine the defense experts regarding the failure to collect the blood gas sample and its impact upon determining the timing and cause of the minor’s alleged brain injury. The court denied the Plaintiff's request for greater sanctions as not warranted by the record before the court.
Monday, April 30, 2018
Spoliation Sanction Granted in Med Mal Case
After review the record before the court and comparing the same to the current status of Pennsylvania law pertaining to sanctions for alleged spoliation of evidence, the court ruled that the Plaintiffs were entitled to an adverse witness jury instruction that the Plaintiff’s counsel would be permitted to cross-examine the defense experts regarding the failure to collect the blood gas sample and its impact upon determining the timing and cause of the minor’s alleged brain injury. The court denied the Plaintiff's request for greater sanctions as not warranted by the record before the court.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.