The court declined to sever or bifurcate the UIM and bad faith claims after finding that the Plaintiff would utilize similar evidence and testimony for both claims. The court also rejected the carrier’s argument that it would be prejudice by a lack of bifurcation because, relative to the bad faith action, the carrier will have to present information on how it values a claim before the jury assesses liability and damages in the UIM portion of the claim.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may
click this LINK.
Source: Article “GEICO Can’t Halt Bad-Faith Claims in
UIM Case, Court Says” By: PJ D’Annunizio.
The Legal Intelligencer
(September 22, 2017).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.