The motion was denied as the court found that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the Plaintiff’s alleged injuries were serious enough to breach the limited tort threshold.
The Plaintiff allegedly sustained multiple permanent disc bulges and sprains to the neck and back. The Plaintiff asserted that these medical issues resulted in decreased employment opportunities and limitations in her ability to perform a job due to the the fact that she was allegedly unable to use her hands fully. The Plaintiff also alleged that her social life was impacted as well.
The Court's Opinion in the Peterman case can be viewed HERE and the companion Order HERE.
Source: "Court Summaries" by Timothy L. Clawges, Pennsylvania Bar News (November 4, 2013 ).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.