According to a report on the case, the court noted that, after the accident, Plaintiff did not immediately seek out medical attention. The day after the collision, the Plaintiff drove himself to the hospital and was treated and released under a diagnosis of a lumbar sprain and contusion.
Thereafter, an
The Plaintiff’s deposition testimony indicated that he alleged ongoing neck and back pain with headaches. The Plaintiff testified that he was restricted in his activities at times, but did not take any medication, and was not disabled. The evidence established that the Plaintiff was restricted by his doctors from lifting, pushing, or pulling more than 10 pounds for six weeks.
The Plaintiff worked as a tow truck driver and missed two and half months of work. He also never returned to an auto repair shop where he had worked periodically.
The court ruled that, despite the Plaintiff’s subjective complaints, there was no objective medical proof provided that the Plaintiff’s injuries amounted to a substantial impairment of a bodily function. Accordingly, the court granted partial summary judgment barring the Plaintiff from seeking non-economic damages for pain and suffering due to the Plaintiff’s failure to offer evidence of a substantial impairment of a bodily function.
Anyone desiring a copy of this decision, may contact the Instant Case Service of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly by calling 1-800-276-7427, provide the above PICS Case No and pay a small fee.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions,”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.