Judge Lesa Gelb Luzerne County |
Erie Insurance objected on the grounds that the Interrogatories exceeded the scope permitted by Cooper v. Schoffstall, 905 A.2d 482 (Pa. 2006). More specifically, Erie Insurance asserted that the Plaintiff had not established a requisite threshold showing to establish “cause” with respect to the expert discovery desired, i.e., a showing of “reasonable grounds” to believe that the expert witness may have entered the “professional witness” category.
After a thorough analysis, including a review of the specific expert Interrogatories request, Judge Gelb concluded that the Plaintiffs “are entitled to inquire into the issues of potential favoritism and whether Drs. Caine and Cavallo entered the professional witness category.”
Judge Gelb went on to direct Erie to answer four (4) of the eight (8) Interrogatories at issue in order to determine whether those doctors “fall into the professional witness category as defined by the Cooper case.” Judge Gelb further ruled that, should the Defendant’s witnesses fall into the professional witness category as defined in the Cooper case based upon the Interrogatories that are required to be answered, the Plaintiff could, thereafter, send supplemental expert discovery in conformity with the Cooper Opinion.
Anyone desiring a copy of this Opinion may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.