According to the Opinion, this case matter involved a rear-end accident case. The Defendant was allegedly wearing a medical boot at the time of the accident against doctor’s orders. During the course of the accident, the Defendant hit the accelerator with the medical boot instead of the brake.
The court followed the current trend and relied upon the case of Monroe v. CBH2O, LP, 286 A.3d 785, 799 (Pa. Super. 2022) (en banc), and held that, at the pleadings stage, a plaintiff is permitted to make a general averment of gross negligence or recklessness as long as negligence is alleged.
As such, the court overruled the Defendant’s Preliminary Objection in this regard.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney Brian J. Walsh of the Scranton law firm of Blake & Walsh for bringing this case to my attention
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney Brian J. Walsh of the Scranton law firm of Blake & Walsh for bringing this case to my attention



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.