In the case of Fisher v. Leo, No. 2025-CV-05941 (C.P. Luz. Co. Feb. 4, 2026, Pierantoni, J.), the court overruled a Defendant’s Preliminary Objections to allegations of recklessness and punitive damages.
In so ruling, the court cited to the Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Monroe v. CBH20, L.P., 286 A.3d 785, 798 (Pa. Super. 2022).
The court also noted that the issue of the validity of claims for recklessness and punitive damages are more appropriate for consideration at the summary judgment stage.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney Peter Biscontini of Biscontini Law for bringing this case to my attention.
The court also noted that the issue of the validity of claims for recklessness and punitive damages are more appropriate for consideration at the summary judgment stage.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney Peter Biscontini of Biscontini Law for bringing this case to my attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.