According to the Opinion, this matter involved an injured party who suffered a gunshot wound after gunfire was exchanged between unidentified individuals who were engaged in an dispute.
![]() |
President Judge James A. Gibbons Lackawanna County |
The carrier for the landowner filed a declaratory judgment action and asserted that coverage was barred under the assault and battery exclusion contained in the policy. After reviewing the policy as compared to the facts alleged in the underlying civil litigation Complaint, the trial court here agreed and granted the carrier’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.
The trial court also rejected the injured party’s efforts to create issues of fact based upon affirmative defenses raised in the injured party’s New Matter responses to the declaratory judgment Complaint. In this regard, the trial court noted that there were boilerplate allegations in the New Matter pleadings and no factual allegations in support of the same.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.