The court noted that, while medical tests completed on the Plaintiff after his visit to the restaurant raised the possibility of E. coli colitis, the record revealed that the Plaintiff was never definitively diagnosed with E. coli. The court also noted that the Plaintiff’s discharge diagnosis from his initial medical visit was for acute gastroenteritis, rather than any specific foodborne illness. It was also indicated that no stool sample was taken that could have been analyzed to definitively identify any foodborne illness.
In granting summary judgment in this matter, the court emphasized that the Plaintiff did not present any competent expert medical evidence to establish a causal link between the Plaintiff's consumption of food at the restaurant and his alleged illness.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.
I send thanks to Attorney Jennifer G. Shorr of the Philadelphia office of the Weber Gallagher law firm for bringing this case to my attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.